| |||||||||||
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Sporting News Today: College football expanded coverage: BCS conference reports, player diaries, schedules
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Why Oklahoma State, LSU, Virginia Tech, Ole Miss will live up to lofty rankings
| |||||||||||
Monday, August 24, 2009
Sporting News Today: Statement week for three MLB teams
| |||||||||||
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Sporting News Today: Five NFL teams still have snap judgments to make
| |||||||||||
Saturday, August 22, 2009
Sporting News Today: Pac-10 is the new home of elite running backs
| |||||||||||
Friday, August 21, 2009
World Cup 2006 Blog
World Cup 2006 Blog | |
| USA World Cup Bid Hosting Cities Down to 27 Posted: 20 Aug 2009 11:32 AM PDT
So while the various nations are bidding against each other to host the 2018 and 2022 World Cups, the cities within those nations are also competing to be part of the official bid. In the case of the United State’s 2018/2022 bid, the shortlist is now down to 27 cities. From those 27, a final 12 to 18 cities must eventually be selected.
Charlotte, North Carloina Chicago, Illinois Cleveland, Ohio Dallas, Texas Denver, Colorado Houston, Texas Indianapolis, Indiana
Los Angeles, California Miami, Florida Nashville, Tennessee New York/N.J. Oakland, California Orlando, Florida Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Phoenix/Glendale, Arizona San Diego, California St. Louis, Missouri Tampa, Florida Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. The odd thing about the US bid is that very few of these stadiums are actually used for the beautiful game (unless you call NFL the beautiful game that is). The progress of soccer specific stadia is obviously a positive for soccer in the US, but the downside is that not many of these structures meet the 40,000 minimum seat requirement for a World Cup destination. Not that this should be a problem. The atmosphere at FedExField for the recent Dc United vs Real Madrid friendly seemed lively enough. You could barely smell the gridiron. The only worrying thing is that leaving MLS stadia unused during the World Cup may tempt the powers that be into keeping the league running while the World Cup is going on. Stranger things have happened… The USA bid will narrow the above list down to 12 to 18 cities by May 2010. Any preference for which cities and stadia should or shouldn’t make the list? |
| You are subscribed to email updates from World Cup Soccer - South Africa 2010 To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Sporting News Today: Contenders begin critical weekend
| |||||||||||
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Sporting News Today: Cowboys Stadium, Favre and Haynesworth to be unveiled this week
| |||||||||||
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
World Cup 2006 Blog
World Cup 2006 Blog | |
| World Cup 2018/2022 Bidding Nation Logos and Slogans Posted: 18 Aug 2009 08:57 AM PDT Bidding to host the World Cup is all about infrastructure. You need quality stadia, reliable public transport and an absolute boatload of available hotel rooms. But you also need a nice looking logo and a catchy slogan. So below are listed all the available logos and slogans for the various World Cup 2018/2022 bids. Australia 2018/2022 - “Come Play!”
Belgium/Netherlands 2018/2022 - “Together for Great Goals” (Together in theory, but the fact that the Netherlands side of the logo dwarfs the Belgian side is surely a coded message.) England 2018/2022 - “…” Deliberately slogan free. Apparently the “Football’s Coming Home” slogan for the 2006 bid was considered arrogant, so this time they’re not risking anything. Qatar 2022 - “It’s Our Time” USA 2018/2022 - “The Game is in Us” (Despite furious Googling, I was unable to find logos for Japan, South Korea, Indonesia Mexico, Russia, or the joint bid from Spain & Portugal. So they must not want it as badly. If you spot any of these logois, please leave a link in the comments.) Please feel free to compare the above (official) slogans with those suggested by World Cup Blog readers. The main thing I’m noticing is that none of the above are particularly good. The USA bid looks like a nuersery/kindergarten logo, the England bid is just the word England badly shaped into a football, and Australia went with the rather unimaginative two kangaroos and a soccer ball. Only Qatar and Belgium/Netherlands get a passing grade. The only explanation I can think of is that if any of the above bids are successful, they’ll have to come up with a whole new logo for the actual tournament. Which might explain why Qatar and Belgium/Netherlands have put the effort in early. Hopefully the other bids are just keeping their graphic design powder dry. FIFA will announce the World Cup 2018 and 2022 hosts in December 2010. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from World Cup Soccer - South Africa 2010 To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Sporting News Today: Eight-page fantasy football guide: Draft a title team with tips from SN's experts
| |||||||||||
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
NCAA's contenders already bit by injury bug
| |||||||||||