Friday, November 20, 2009

Latest World Cup Blog Updates

Latest World Cup Blog Updates

Link to World Cup Soccer - South Africa 2010

Ireland Demands Replay With Honest-To-Goodness Precedent

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 09:10 AM PST

DV605831The furor over last night’s game will not settle down anytime soon. Not tomorrow, not next week, not even before the traveling circus takes to South Africa next summer. Not unless something is done to eradicate the impact of The Hand of Henry on the outcome of the game.

The Irish FA, of course you’d hear from them, have come up with a simple solution: replay the game. But perhaps more important than any march on the Swiss headquarters, they have that all important word known as a precedent.

The letter from the Irish FA reads like this:

“Conclusive video evidence of a deliberate hand ball by Henry, which led to France’s additional-time goal, has been seen by millions of football fans worldwide. The blatantly incorrect decision by the referee to award the goal has damaged the integrity of the sport.

“We now call on Fifa, as the world governing body for our sport, to organise for this match to be replayed. The handball was recognised by the Fifa commissioner, the referee observer and the match officials, as well as by the player himself.”

“There is precedent for the invalidation of such results. In 2005, the Bureau of the Fifa World Cup organising committee reached a decision to invalidate the result of a World Cup qualification match between Uzbekistan and Bahrain on the basis of a ‘technical error by the referee of the match’.

“The Football Association of Ireland is hoping that Fifa and its disciplinary committee will, on behalf of football fans worldwide, act in a similar fashion so that the standards of fair play and integrity can be protected.”

And the official FIFA report reads like this:

According to Art. 12.4 (b) and 14.1 of the Regulations for the 2006 FIFA World Cup™, all protests, including those against technical errors committed by referees, are to be decided by the Organising Committee for the 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany™. A bureau of the Organising Committee may pass a decision in lieu of the plenary committee in urgent matters.

The Bureau, composed of Chairman Lennart Johansson, Deputy Chairman Julio Grondona, Dr Chung Mong Joon and FIFA General Secretary Urs Linsi, took the decision based on the following facts:
1) At the score of 1-0 in favour of Uzbekistan, in the 39th minute of the match, the referee decided to award a penalty kick to Uzbekistan;
2) The penalty kick was taken and led to goal in favour of Uzbekistan;
3) Before the penalty kick was carried out, an Uzbek player entered the penalty area;
4) Consequently, the referee awarded an indirect free kick to the Bahrain team;
5) However, in such a situation, the Laws of the Game require the referee to order the penalty kick to be retaken;
6) The captain of Uzbekistan team protested to the referee immediately after the mistake had taken place and before the game had restarted. This protest was confirmed after the match;
7) This technical error was confirmed by the match commissioner and the referee inspector in their respective reports;
8) Uzbekistan protested the decision of the referee in a written request, asking for the match to be “cancelled” and be evaluated with a 3-0 forfeit result;

The bureau, taking into consideration that the referee in the match in question had indeed committed a technical error, established that, as a consequence, the match needed to be replayed. As a result, the protest put forward by the Uzbekistan team for the match to be considered a forfeit with a 3–0 result is rejected. In accordance with Art. 12.6 of the Regulations 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany™, this decision is final and binding.

* – Smiley face added for bonus apology.

Funnily enough, Uzbekistan protested their mere 1-0 win and earned the right to the replay…and then lost the playoff on the back of an away goal scored in that very same replay. Be careful what you wish for…

The problem is Uzbekistan and Bahrain are not France and Ireland. Either could’ve gone to Germany and the actual participant likely would’ve mattered little. The acronyms pander to the big countries, as they’re the ones which will generate the most money, and as such the integrity of FIFA is and always has been very much up for debate. If the debate is even necessary. Fact is, they want France in the World Cup for a multitude of reasons.

The other problem, of course, is that the incidents aren’t parallel. One is a missed call while the other is an error in applying the rules of the game. Not quite apples and oranges, but oranges and another member of the citrus family. Maybe a tangerine.

However, a precedent is a precedent, and I gather even most France fans would agree a replay, one where Titi’s arms are pinned to his side with epoxy, is only fair. Now the only question, having been officially petitioned, is whether FIFA will reach back into their own history and make the same call once again.

Don’t hold your breath, unfortunately.

XI Things We Learned From The World Cup Qualifying Playoffs

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 06:40 AM PST

Uruguay Costa Rica WCup SoccerThe games didn’t really have everything, did they? The results did – some upsets, some heroics, a few of the expected teams going in – but outside of the one game which forced a playoff (Egypt 2 – Algeria 0), some of these games were completely zapped of the necessary drama.

(Not, of course, that one played in the Stade de France.)

And sometimes, that’s how you know the World Cup is on the fore. Staunch defense, gritty performances and the triumph of will over superiority. The World Cup Qualifying has definitively been left in the dust, but we did learn a thing or two…

i. Guus is destructible.

You know, I had a discussion with someone recently on the world's greatest coach and I reckoned Guus Hiddink was the greatest of them all. His ability to mold an inferior material into something else entirely is, or was, unmatched, really. Fergie, Carletto and Pep are nice, but they can run out one big euro signing after another. The perfect synonym for a great coach is an alchemist. For me, Guus is – or was – that. Russia's wondrous display at Euro 2008 was only undone by a vastly superior team and they looked, after two more years of nurturing, a blossoming giant ready to set the world alight in South Africa 2010.

Now they'll be watching at home with the rest of us. Partly because Russia looked anything but the fluid, dynamic team we saw in Swissaustria. Partly because of the notion that superiority will always win out. Because Slovenia wanted it more, that much was clear. Slovenia played their socks off and, through confusion or motivation, Russia didn’t. Either way, that’s down to the coach. A great coach, yes, but one whose aura has taken a hit from which it may never recover.

ii. Wednesday’s most serious offender was not Titi Henry, but adidas.

SOCCER-WORLD/FRANCE

The only explanation is that Raymond ordered Les Bleus dominatrix editions for his kinky extracurriculars and adidas mistakenly swapped them with the real deal.

Poor choice on both occasions.

iii. Roman Pavlyuchenko will shut up now.

God, it seemed every quarter open a new quote would pop up from Spurs benchlover Pavlyuchenko needs to get out of London – and I know much of this is journalists posing a question, but still – and back to some playing time in order to cement his World Cup place.

Not really a problem now, is it?

iv. Raymond Domenech is @#$%ing indestructible.

If there is anything which can unite the entire footballing world, it’s one thing: Raymond Domenech is an absolutely abysmal football coach. He has no business doing your niece’s Sunday game, much less Les Bleus. If France goes out, there is little to no chance Raymond Domenech makes it to Thursday morning employed. And this despite whatever scandalous blackmail material he holds over the leaders of the FFF (French Football Federation).

But somehow, some goddamn way, the referee and the linesmen all missed Thierry Henry’s handball. And then they missed the second one. And France won drew; and France went through.

There is no explanation for this man’s employment. There is no explanation as to the ‘luck’ this man receives (if Abidal doesn’t earn a red and Ribery doesn’t get injured yet France still go out, does he still stay employed?). It’s all so infuriatingly inexplicable.

So inexplicable I may give this astrology he holds so dear a try.

v. And even if France perform poorly, the French will have two teams to root for.

I will not pretend to know anything about French-Algerian relations. What I do know is that of the 25 players called up to play in the one-off playoff with Egypt, 15 on the Algerian national football team were born in France. Yes, fifteen.

Will every last one of these players go to South Africa? Doubtful. But it’s equally as doubtful the squad won’t be riddled with French-born players. So the French can allez les bleus! And then, if that doesn’t work out, allez Algeria!

vi. Keylor Navas is coming to a European city near you.

His Wikipedia page may say that only the Spanish Segunda is calling, but they may want to close the deal quickly, as a few others will be checking in with his Costa Rican club. The 22yo Costa Rican keeper put on a performance that would’ve had Gigi Buffon blushing today. Uruguay tested him early and often from distance, and he made one sprawling save after another. The stats only say five, but it felt like fifty, and isn’t mental intimidation half the battle?

vii. Egypt are the pre-2008 Spain.

Egypt have not made it to a World Cup since 1990, making next summer the 20th anniversary of their last trip to the finals. In fact they’ve only made it twice in total, going way back to 1934 for their only other trip. Neither time did they make it past the first round.

And yet they’re the most successful team in the history of the African Cup of Nations. They’ve won it thrice since their last trek to the World Cup, and the last two back-to-back. They should be going to the World Cup, as they’re clearly one of Africa’s most superior teams, if not the most superior. In fact winning two AFCON titles in a row nearly mandates you as the best team on the continent.

How do you explain it? They’re not quite parallel with a pre-2008 Spain – they do have a trophy cabinet – but one must think that, relative to expectations, Egypt are now football’s biggest chokers. Other theories certainly welcome, but the mysteries surrounding it are befitting their ancestors.

viii. The Uruguayan national anthem needs to be cut down to a verse and a chorus. And no face paint.

Uruguay, making sure they got their full patriotism in for the day, put on a five minute – well, 4m56s – national anthem, full with a guy is creepily feline blue, white and gold face paint. It was so unnecessarily long the Costa Rican squad had to leave mid-song in order to warm up; the Uruguayan players even wondered just what the hell was going on by the forty-fifth verse.


ix. Eastern Europe still has a bit to go.

At the beginning of the day, one assured participant and three potential. At the end of the day, it was but that lone assured participant – and not even the team the world had been predicting.

Eastern Europe, particularly the leagues of Russia & Ukraine, are rising in the eyes of footballing legitimacy. They have money, homegrown talent and know to scout the Americas and Africa for talent that will choose a nice paycheck and playing time over a seat on a European bench. Unfortunately, for whatever reason, they could not capitalize on it. Not Bosnia-Herzegovina, not Russia, not Ukraine – not even perhaps the best of the bunch, Croatia.

A disappointing showing from what you’d expect to be a new footballing hotbed.

And yes, I still blame Kristen Pazik.

x. Don’t expect open floodgates in South Africa.

Scorelines from all 13 World Cup “playoff” games (including New Zealand – Bahrain, and remembering the first Egypt – Algeria fixture wasn’t technically a playoff):

0-0
2-1
0-1
1-0
0-0
1-0
0-1
1-1
1-0
0-1
1-0
1-0
1-1

And the only team which managed more than a solitary goal was knocked out.

Welcome to World Cup football: caution is the name of the game.

xi. Video replay is necessary.

The impossible has happened once again: a crucial game was decided by the wrong call which so easily could have been corrected.

Not really worth the debate anymore, is it?

NFL Week 11 Extra: Slumping QBs Cutler, Ryan, Sanchez face crucial tests

SNT Header

MAMUDU,

Your November 20, 2009 issue of Sporting News Today is now available, please click here.



If you experience any problems with your issue, please click here to contact our customer service department.

Know a friend who might like Sporting News Today? Email him/her this link: www.sportingnewstoday.com.

cover
 

  Trouble Viewing? If any of the above links do not work for you,
  copy and paste this URL into your browser:
  http://today.sportingnews.com/t=c/?1&116357&154416&17555&0000&1236487748&EIInjEOx9cS45
 

  Please do not reply to this message. Questions may be submitted to Digital Support.

  To stop receiving email notifications for digital issues of Sporting News Today,
  click here.

  Sporting News Today 120 West Morehead Street Suite 200 Charlotte, NC 28202

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Latest World Cup Blog Updates

Latest World Cup Blog Updates

Link to World Cup Soccer - South Africa 2010

The Hand of Henry: What They Said.

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 04:10 AM PST

SOCCER-WORLD/FRANCEWithout getting into a great deal of opinion, or any at all for that matter – there’s surely plenty of that floating about – it would probably be prudent to look into the words on each side of the divide from those who were there, at the game and directly impacted. (What with it being one of the most controversial games in World Cup Qualifying history and all.) Guys like that Henry character who’s found his name splattered all over the news for all the wrong reasons for the first time, at least it would seem, in his illustrious career. And that Trapattoni guy, who wasn’t making friends at FIFA before the incident.

Thierry Henry (French assist man):
“Yes, there is handball but I am not the referee. I’m in the box, there are two defenders in front of me. The ball bounced off my hand, the referee did not see it and I played on. It doesn’t change anything to the fact that I’m happy we have qualified.”

“We suffered for two years, we have been having some problems with our press, our fans, with other people It would have been better to do it in another way, but as I said, I’m not the ref.”

“If they had got through it wouldn’t have been robbery (lucky). We have a lot of respect for this team,” Henry said. “We knew they play long and like a physical battle. You saw tonight that they are a very good team. I played eight years in England and I can tell you they are.”

Sebastien Squillaci (French defender): “It’s part of the game, it played in our favour tonight, maybe some other time it will play against us. Of course Ireland will not he happy but we are happy the referee awarded the goal. We’re competitors and we’re there to win. The goal may not be valid but we’ll take it.”

Giovanni Trapattoni (Ireland coach): “I told the referee that it is possible to make great mistakes. I am sad because the referee had time to ask the linesman and I am sure he should have asked Henry as well.”

“All the European people saw the game and what happened. France played a good game in Dublin but this time we played better and over the two games we deserved to go to South Africa.”

Raymond Domenech (French coach): “I didn’t see the replay. From where I was, I couldn’t see anything. All I know is the referee awarded the goal.”

Richard Dunne (Irish defender on Henry):
“He told us we deserved to win. How is that supposed to make me feel? It makes me feel worse. He’s admitted he cheated. We should have won. He just said, ‘That’s it’. He just said he handled it, he didn’t mean it. Looking at it, it’s quite obvious he did mean it. It’s there for everyone to see and they’re not going to change it now. So what can we do? They’re going to the World Cup and we’re not. That’s it.”

“The referee said he was 100 per cent that he didn’t handle it and then Henry came and told us that he did. I think it’s quite blatant we were cheated. It’s not a difficult one to see, so that’s the annoying thing.

“The linesman is in line with it and he should give offside to start with. Surely one of them can see it that he’s handled it, everyone else has seen it. It’s one of those that wouldn’t even need a replay.

“At the stage of the game and the way it was going, it’s the biggest decision I’ve ever suffered. We deserved to win the game, we could have scored a couple of more goals. It’s one of those things. It gives them a lift and knocks the stuffing out of us. To give big decisions on that in big games is wrong. Platini wants France there.”

Liam Brady (Ireland ass’t manager):
“When it comes to the crunch, the big teams always seem to go through. With the draw, they were wanting Portugal and France to go through and they did. That’s all that has to be said.”

Robbie Keane (Irish striker):
“It was an easy decision to do the seedings, wasn’t it? They’re all probably on the phone to Sepp Blatter now, texting each other over the result. France and Germany are massive countries. There’s no way in a million years there was going to be a fair draw. And it wasn’t!”

“There’s no question or doubt in my mind, we won that game. The handball was so obvious. We’ve seen the replays, but we knew anyway from the reaction of the players.”

Florent Malouda (French free-kick taker):
“I didn’t see it – I was really far. I took the free-kick – but I could see from the reactions that there was a problem. He tried to score and maybe the ball touched his hand – the referee didn’t see it, we have to see on the replay if there was a hand.”

William Gallas (French goal scorer):
“It went so fast. I saw Thierry’s pass. The Irish were surprised, and I put my head, my chest,” he said as his voice trailed off.

[guardian; The Independent; Canadian Press; AP]

Algeria Takes The Champs-Élysées. Next: The World!

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 02:10 AM PST

France Algeria Egypt Soccer Reaction

This is a picture of what’s currently going down in the center of Paris. No, that is not a Frenchman celebrating the lack of video replay in football. No, that is not an Irishman infuriated by the lack of integrity by one Thierry Henry. Hell, it’s not even the CEO of Caran d’Ache. (Well, it could be.)

It’s actually an Algerian fan, celebrating their impending trek to South Africa on the famous Parisian street the Avenue des Champs-Élysées. The same avenue which Algerian fans ran riot over, quite literally, last evening.

The carnage – not literally, the injured were removed – after the jump.

FBL-WC2010-AFR2010-EGY-ALG-FRA

FBL-WC2010-AFR2010-EGY-ALG-FRA

FBL-WC2010-AFR2010-EGY-ALG-FRA

FBL-WC2010-AFR2010-EGY-ALG-FRA

FBL-WC2010-ALG-EGY

FBL-WC2010-AFR2010-EGY-ALG-FRA

FRANCE/

FBL-WC2010-AFR2010-EGY-ALG-FRA

France Algeria Egypt Soccer Reaction

The 32 Teams of the 2010 World Cup

Posted: 18 Nov 2009 08:40 PM PST

fifa-world-cup-2010Qualification is officially over. Playoffs won, tears shed, hearts broken and dreams renewed, it’s all over. After Uruguay withstood the Costa Rican pressure late in the evening, the final 32 teams were written into stone – though not without a fair bit of controversy.

The following are those 32 teams who will take part in South Africa 2010. And perhaps what’s a bit special is the 32 include every single World Cup winner in history, precisely due to the Uruguayan stand.


Algeria
Argentina**
Australia
Brazil*****
Cameroon
Chile
Cote d’Ivoire
Denmark
England*
France*
Germany***
Ghana
Greece
Honduras
Italy****
Japan
Mexico
Netherlands
North Korea
New Zealand
Nigeria
Paraguay
Portugal
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Switzerland
United States
Uruguay**

Number of asterisks (*) indicates number of trophies won.

For the draw pots, check out the Malawi World Cup Blog.

Daily Dose: November 18th, 2009.

Posted: 18 Nov 2009 06:40 PM PST

The Algerian post-match celebrations.


[101GG]

Thierry Henry Handballs France into World Cup 2010. Would You Have Done the Same?

Posted: 18 Nov 2009 04:02 PM PST

Algeria, Greece, Portugal and Slovenia all won their playoffs and qualified for the World Cup today. Uruguay vs Costa Rica is happening as I type. But there’s one story that will be dominating the World Cup playoff headlines, and I think you already know what it is: Thierry Henry’s handball for France vs Ireland.

With the aggregate score at 1-1 and the game halfway through extra time, penalties were just around the corner. But in the 103rd minute Thierry Henry controlled the ball and crossed for William Gallas to head home the goal that sent France to World Cup 2010 and Ireland home. Only problem is that Henry controlled the ball with his hand. Twice.

To be more accurate, Henry controlled the ball on his forearm and then directed it with his hand. It was the upper body equivelant of taking the ball on your knee and then passing with your foot. There is very very little doubt in my mind that Henry handballed intentionally.

So yes, Henry has cheated France into World Cup 2010. Which is absolutely disgraceful. Not just from Henry but from the refereeing team too.

But before we all condemn Henry, let me ask you this. And please answer honestly: Would you have done the same?

If you were fighting to get your team to World Cup 2010, wouldn’t you do everything in your power to make it happen? Even if it meant bending or breaking the rules? I’m not excusing what Henry did, and he’s definitely (to quote Kevin Keegan) gone down in my estimation tonight. But I can definitely understand why he did it.

World Cup Playoffs Live Chit Chat

Posted: 18 Nov 2009 11:07 AM PST

FBL-WC2010-AFR2010-EGY–ALG-FANS

Soundoff: Your Football Team’s Biggest International Rival?

Posted: 18 Nov 2009 08:08 AM PST

rivalsIn honour of today’s Algeria vs Egypt showdown in Sudan, I had planned on putting together a Top 10 Biggest International Rivalries post. But halfway through I realized it wasn’t a great idea. Your own national team’s rivalry will always feel bigger than anyone else’s, so why include some in a Top 10 but not others?

Also, it’s not always so straightforward. I’m an England fan, and I know Scotland fans would love to see Scotland beat England. But I’d love to see England beat Germany. And Germany fans seem more interested in Germany beating the Netherlands.

So, rather than trying to definitively list the biggest international rivalries and get it wrong, let’s try this instead: You tell me. Please share two things in the comments:

1. Your national team.
2. The rival national team you’d most like to see them beat.

If you want to tell is why, then that works too. But please keep the reasons football related.