Monday, February 8, 2010

World Cup 2010 Blog: “How Sustainable is a World Cup?” plus 2 more

World Cup 2010 Blog: “How Sustainable is a World Cup?” plus 2 more

Link to World Cup Soccer - South Africa 2010

How Sustainable is a World Cup?

Posted: 07 Feb 2010 05:02 PM PST

soccercity

…or European Championship for that matter?

I recently came across an article (Warning: Google Translate content) on a German website called Stadionwelt (Stadium World), that dealt with the rather grim reality in post Euro 2004 Portugal, or better the post Euro 2004 SuperLiga.

The article was about the possibility that a couple of stadiums, that were either expensively renovated or built from the ground up for UEFA’s showpiece tournament, could be teared down again in the near future. The stadiums turned out to be far too big for the local clubs. For example, second division side SC Beira Mar from the small town of Aveiro competes in the 30.000 capacity Estádio Municipal de Aveiro, built for €94m. Third/Fourth division sides Farense and Louletano, from the equally small towns of Faro and Loulé, share the 30.000 capacity Estádio Algarve renovated for €61m. First division side U.D. Leiria plays in the 30.000 capacity Estádio Dr. Magalhães Pessoa built for €20m, and averages around 4000 per game so far this season – with a home game crowd of 22.000 against Benfica improving the average of otherwise a couple of hundred up to one or two thousand per game. I guess the local authorities never really expected that the clubs’ rent could help repay the money borrowed to build the grounds, but maybe they at least hoped that they could cover running costs. Yet, it seems this modest goal isn’t too realistic either, resulting in some politicians suggesting that it may make more sense to simply tear some of the stadiums down again, to at least stop losing more money with them.

I guess, UEFA couldn’t care less what happens with the stadium infrastructure in the host country, once they handed out the trophy, counted the money and moved on. And it’s certainly also up to the host to have a plan for the stadiums beyond the tournament. Still, Portugal is actually a rather tame example, as the stadiums aren’t that big and that expensive – at least relative to the minimum requirements of a FIFA World Cup.

In a letter sent by FIFA to nations bidding for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups, FIFA “states that around 12 stadia with a minimum capacity of 40.000 will be needed to host the tournament. The stadium for the final will have to have at least 80.000 seats.”

These requirements are completely disconnected from the realities in the majority of football leagues around the globe. The German Bundesliga is currently the only league that averages over 40.000 per game and that has/had twelve or more clubs in the first division with 40.000+ average attendances. The other big European leagues in England, Italy and France have the potential to fill stadiums of that capacity as well. Spain seems to feel that a joint World Cup bid with Portugal makes more sense for them. The US can of course just pick twelve American football stadiums of their liking. A country like Brazil, in the still slightly distant future and given current economic growth continues, could find them useful as well. Then you’d need to wait for some Asian countries and India to not just support Manchester United, but actually go and watch football in their local leagues, which currently isn’t happening. You could even make an argument, that the US might be better off building a few smaller football specific grounds for a World Cup, that have a chance to actually be of use to an MLS franchise later on.

The South African Premier Soccer League averaged around 8000 in 2008/2009, and even if the World Cup gives the local league a major boost, you can already easily predict that the beautiful stadiums built for the World Cup will be largely underutilized once Sepp Blatter handed out the trophy. South Africa will have to deal with the costs and FIFA with the money they earned.


Photo: Mohamed Zidan Loves Shrimp

Posted: 07 Feb 2010 04:58 PM PST

Mohamed Zidan

Egypt’s striker Mohamed Zidan decided that his head is the perfect platform to declare his love for his favorite sea food.

Meanwhile, if you love Egyptian football: we are looking for someone to continue Tamim’s work over at the Egypt Worldcupblog.

(Photo: Christof Koepsel/Bongarts/Getty Images)


Euro 2012 Qualifying Draw

Posted: 07 Feb 2010 01:07 PM PST

uefaeuro2012logos

The biggest sporting event of 2010 will undoubtedly be the Euro 2012 qualifiers due to begin on September 3rd and 4th. At least for the alpine micro state of Liechtenstein, drawn into Group I together with Euro title holders, current cream of the crop of world football and by then potential World Cup winners Spain. If you are not a micro citizen you might want to stick to the World Cup in South Africa of course.

Here’s the rest of today’s draw for the qualifying stage of the European Championships 2012 in Poland and Ukraine (taken straight from uefa.com):

euro2012qualifiers

The nine group winners and the best runner-up will qualify directly. Play-offs (seeded if needed) between the other eight runner-ups will determine the remaining four tickets to Poland/Ukraine.

In Group A, Germany get to visit their neighbors from right across the border and right across the street. Scandinavia has been neatly packaged into Group E and H. Russia looks for revenge against Slovenia, and will settle for Slovakia in Group B. Group D will serve up the long awaited rematch of that epic Euro 2008 encounter between France and Romania. Group F is Malta’s best ever miniscule chance to make it to the European Championship finals. In other words: some exciting international breaks are once again looming on the horizon.

Your thoughts?

For team specific analysis head over to our European national team blogs.


10-Page Super Bowl Extra: Expert analysis of Saints win, plus player interviews, stats, photos and more

SNT Header

MAMUDU,

Your February 08, 2010 issue of Sporting News Today is now available, please click here.



If you experience any problems with your issue, please click here to contact our customer service department.

Know a friend who might like Sporting News Today? Email him/her this link: www.sportingnewstoday.com.

cover
 

  Trouble Viewing? If any of the above links do not work for you,
  copy and paste this URL into your browser:
  http://today.sportingnews.com/t=c/?1&121404&156130&18891&0000&1236490260&EIInjEOx9cS45
 

  Please do not reply to this message. Questions may be submitted to Digital Support.

  To stop receiving email notifications for digital issues of Sporting News Today,
  click here.

  Sporting News Today 120 West Morehead Street Suite 200 Charlotte, NC 28202

Sunday, February 7, 2010

World Cup 2010 Blog: “Is the role of captain overrated?” plus 1 more

World Cup 2010 Blog: “Is the role of captain overrated?” plus 1 more

Link to World Cup Soccer - South Africa 2010

Is the role of captain overrated?

Posted: 06 Feb 2010 10:20 AM PST

CaptainsArmbandsI’m guessing you’re probably tired of hearing about the whole John Terry situation by now. I know I’m beginning to be fed up of it being seemingly the only news story around.

To some extent, I have to wonder quite why such a fuss has been made – afterall it is only the armband that’s been taking away from Terry as Daryl rightly pointed out. Nothing else.

When England go into the World Cup in South Africa, just like every other nation they’ll need plenty of on the field leaders. It won’t matter that Terry doesn’t have the armband, there will still be moments where he is needed to put an arm around someone, to fire someone up for a match, to give a rousing talk etc.

It makes me wonder – does it matter who is captain, at club or country?

I noticed today that UEFA has a celebration of all those captains that have lifted the European Cup. It sure is an impressive list of names – Beckenbauer, Platini, Deschamps etc, but would it have mattered if one of their teamates was wearing the armband? I doubt it.

In something like, Rugby, the role of the captain serves some kind of purpose – its only the Captain who is allowed to speak to the referee for example (to cut out these kind of scenes) and that makes sense.

I know some countries don’t worry about who is Captain and just give it to the player with the most caps. To me it does seem a bit of a formality, but it must mean something to someone, or else there wouldn’t be this fuss about Terry.

I just think that on the pitch, especially at international level, you’re going to need all your players to stand up and be counted. If you’re relying on one player to try and get them in the right frame of mind, you’re in a bad place to begin with, aren’t you?


Thierry Henry’s favourite Ref makes the World Cup

Posted: 06 Feb 2010 06:55 AM PST

thierry-henry-handballI don’t know if you recall, but France qualified for the upcoming World Cup in South Africa in quite controversial circumstances. To refresh your memory, Thierry Henry had to use his hand, twice, to get the ball across to William Gallas, so the latter could put France on that World Cup Plane. Ireland felt a bit miffed, but they might feel a bit more confused shortly.

The referee who allowed the goal, Martin Hansson, is in Fifa’s squad of referee’s who will make the World Cup in South Africa. One of his linesmen has also made it, Stefan Wittberg was included but Fredrik Nilsson missed out.

Seems a bit of an oversight by FIFA to be honest. I mean, all ref’s make mistakes, and a referee shouldn’t be endlessly punished for one mistake that they make.

But on the other hand – he made a big mistake in a high profile match, which hardly fills you with confidence. And by including him, its only drawn attention to the referees which probably isn’t what they need anyway.

A full list of the referee’s picked for SA is available in this slightly awkward document on the FIFA website.