World Cup 2010 Blog: “Bob Bradley Staying on as USA Coach Until 2014. Why It’s the Right Move.” plus 1 more | ![]() |
Bob Bradley Staying on as USA Coach Until 2014. Why It’s the Right Move. Posted: 30 Aug 2010 08:35 PM PDT
Frankly, I think I agree with Sunil Gulati and co. I know a lot of US fans are impatient and wanted a more glamorous name in charge of the team. But I’m thinking this is the right move. Here’s why: Bob Bradley really did lead the US team to the top of World Cup group for the first time. That’s progress. Sure he made a mistake in starting Ricardo Clark against Ghana. But is Ricardo Clark really so bad that giving him a shirt is a sackable offence? The answer is no, it’s not. Don’t forget that Bradley’s USA team also beat Spain in the 2009 Confederations Cup and came thisclose to taking down Brazil and winning the whole thing too. I’d also argue that there seems to be a genuine team spirit around the US team at the moment. A genuine positive vibe. Why ruin that by removing the man who created it? Most importantly, there was no viable replacement. Guus Hiddink is working for Turkey and Jürgen Klinsmann apparently isn’t interested. Last but not least, Bob Bradley is probably the most qualified American coach for the job right now. I’d argue that being American is uniquely important for the US job. Not necessarily for patriotic reasons (though I suppose that helps) but more because US Soccer and Major League Soccer and the whole American system is a labyrinth of quirks that only a coach like Bradley who knows that world can navigate successfully. So no, four more years of Bob Bradley may not be the most glamorous option. But if US fans want the team to continue making steady progress between now and 2014, then it might be the right one. - Melissa over at the USA blog has taken the decision as a mixed blessing, and is preparing for “four more years of sideline scowls and the most magnificent sweatpants collection in FIFA.” |
Jürgen Klinsmann Talking to U.S. Soccer Again? Posted: 30 Aug 2010 12:00 PM PDT
Side-stepping ESPN’s journalistic integrity like Barry Sanders in his prime (yeah, I made an NFL reference) I’m wondering if this means the most drawn out managerial appointment in the history of international football is about to happen. Klinsmann was the firm favourite to replace Bruce Arena as U.S. coach after the 2006 World Cup, before Bradley was given the job first on an interim basis and then full-time. Bradley’s contract expires in December, and so if Klinsmann really is going to take this job, then now would be the time. Personally I question Klinsmann’s suitability for the job. Though his Germany did well at the 2006 World Cup, they were absolutely horrible under Klinsmann for the two years leading up to the tournament. There’s even an argument that Klinsmann’s then-assistant Jogi Löw was the real brains behind the operation, and Klinsmann’s subsequent failure as Bayern Munich boss would seem to support that theory. I’d even argue that Team USA is about to enter a period of very little competitive soccer, much like the two years before the World Cup where Klinsmann struggled. CONCACAF may be about to rejig its World Cup qualifying process, but that still leave the USA semi-idle until World Cup 2014 qualifying starts. It’s not like in South America where there’s the Copa Libertadores 2011 to build towards, or in Europe where Euro 2012 qualifying is about to begin. And no, the Gold Cup doesn’t count. So is Klinsmann really the man to coach the U.S. through the quite times and then on to World Cup 2014? I say no. But on the other hand, I now 100% want this to happen, if only because when a rumour starts in 2006 and is still being rumoured in 2010, then we may as well just jump in and see what happens. |
You are subscribed to email updates from World Cup Soccer - South Africa 2010 To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |